Weblog Article Peer Review Form A – First Review
Writer’s Name: Carmen Keers
Assessor’s name: Janoeke Pauw
Date: 12 oktober 2007
Rating Scale: 1 = Yes 2 = Somewhat 3 = No
Rate the article by giving a 1, 2 or 3 for each question. Read the article once to get a general idea of what it is about, then read it a second time to rate it.
1. Is the topic interesting? 1
2. Is the title original and appropriate? 1
3. Is the introduction complete? 1
4. Is the body of the article complete? 1
5. Is the conclusion well-developed? 1
6. Is the article well-organized overall? 1
7. Is the article easy to understand? 1
8. Is the article interesting to read? 1
9. Has the writer plagiarised material? 3
Finally, read the article a third time and check it for spelling, grammar andpunctuation. Mark any corrections on the article itself then complete the rest of the form.
Name three things you like about the article.
- It’s written clear
- It’s understandable
- It’s an interesting subject
Name three things the writer should improve.
- Some sentences are not formed well, like: ‘Some video sharing sites came up with something that will appeal to viewers and that marketeers will also like.’ Should that be: ‘Some video sharing sites came up with something that will appeal to viewers and that also marketeers will like.’?
- Some words are not written on the right way, like: ‘The new media are climbing to a unknown rate.’ Should that be: ‘The new media are climbing to an unknown rate.’?
- There are no titles in the article itself.
What is the gist of the article?
Online advertising is increasing very fast and, but a mix of traditional media can still be fare more effective.
Do you think this article is good enough to pass the course? Explain your answer.
When the writer improves the three things, the article will be good enough to pass the course. It’s a clear and well structured article about a very interesting subject.
