Weblog Article Peer Review Form B – Second Review
Writer’s Name: Janoeke P.
Assessor’s name: Carmen K.
Date: 12 October 2007
Rating Scale: 1 = Yes 2 = Somewhat 3 = No
Rate the article by giving a 1, 2 or 3 for each question. Read the article once to get a general idea of what it is about, then read it a second time to rate it.
1. Is the topic interesting? 1
2. Is the title original and appropriate? 1
3. Is the introduction complete? 1
4. Is the body of your article complete? 1
5. Is the conclusion well-developed? 1
6. Is the article well-organized overall? 1
7. Is the article easy to understand? 1
8. Is the article interesting to read? 1
9. Has any plagiarised material been removed? 3
Do you feel that the writer has improved the article? Why or why not? Be specific.
Yes, I only made a few little comments but she did improve them.
Has the writer changed the article adequately according to your suggestions forimprovement of your first assessment? Describe the changes and state specificallywhether you think they are an improvement.
I made comments about the written language and spelling mistakes. She corrected them all.Are you happy to have this article on your weblog? Why or why not? Be specific.
Yes, I do. I think the article is interesting to read and well-developed. Also the conclusion is interesting for our O’Neill project.
